In principal, it does. A borrower who wants to be protected against a rate increase during the lock period, but would like to take advantage of a rate decline, can purchase a "float-down." A float-down provides the same upside protection as a lock, plus an option to reduce the rate if market rates decline. Since it carries more value to the borrower than a lock, and is more costly to the lender to provide, the borrower pays more for it. A lender who charges 1.25 points for a 60-day lock might charge 1.75 points for a 60-day float-down.
Many refinancing borrowers pay for a lock but act as if they have a float-down. If rates decline during the lock period, they demand a lower rate and if they don't get it, they start anew with another loan provider. I call them "lock-jumpers."
I once criticized lock-jumpers, going so far as to compare them to shoplifters. But the following letter caused me to reconsider.
"Why would a 'lock-jumper' be considered a shoplifter? It seems to me that most lenders and brokers don't tell the borrower that a lock is binding on them if rates go down, and generally the borrower doesn't sign anything indicating such a commitment. If they had wanted a commitment, they should have asked for one."
This reader makes a very good point. If a broker or lender allows ambiguity regarding the borrower's commitment under a rate lock, then the borrower is entitled to interpret that ambiguity as he or she pleases. Lock-jumping is OK, in other words, unless the borrower has committed him or herself in writing not to do it.
Was this article helpful?
Legal strategies that credit bureaus, creditors and debt collectors do not want you to know! How to use consumer credit protection laws, without hiring a lawyer, and without going to court! At some point in your life, either you, or someone you know will need this information.